gh-92611: Add details on replacements for cgi utility funcs #92792
+31
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(The PR is ready for review; I've just marked it as a draft pending the resolution of the question above) |
slateny
reviewed
May 14, 2022
|
|
||
| For example, with :class:`email.message.EmailMessage`:: | ||
|
|
||
| from email.message import EmailMessage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be three spaces instead of four?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Per @brettcannon 's suggestions on the Discourse thread, discussed in #92611 and as a followup to PR #92612 , this PR add additional specific per-function replacement information for the utility functions in the
cgimodule deprecated by PEP 594 (PEP-594).@brettcannon , should this be backported (without the
deprecated-removed, which I would update it accordingly and re-add in my other PR adding that to the others for 3.11+), or just go in 3.11+?