Hi,

It seems like the HTTP Assert package does not allow me to specify a body to pass in a POST request for example. Looking at the HTTPBody() function, the body argument is set to nil:
req, err := http.NewRequest(method, url+"?"+values.Encode(), nil)

Is this by design, or am I looking at a missing feature?

Cheers,

On top of being able to specify item type, which must hold for every item, it should be possible to specify the contains schema, which must hold true for at least 1 item by default. It should be possible to specify min/max times the schema may occur using minContains, maxContains.

See https://json-schema.org/understanding-json-schema/reference/array.html#contains

As part of this,

Description

Nested AssertionScopes only report the outer-most scope reportables on failure. This is true regardless of whether the outer scope has any reportables -- i.e., if only the inner scope has reportables, nothing is reported.

Complete minimal example reproducing the issue

[TestMethod]
public void TestNestedAssertionScopes()
{
    using (var outerScope = new A

Summary of the feature request

As a contributor or maintainer of a project I'd like to be able to help other contributors to correctly mock functions by failing a test if a mock does not exist. This would be very useful in situations when there are very complex scripts that handle a lot of scenarios and using a lot of external helper functions.

The ask would be to add a new parameter to `Mo

Feature summary

assertThat(Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4)).containsExactly(1, 3, 2, 4);

yields the following error message:

java.lang.AssertionError: 
Actual and expected have the same elements but not in the same order, at index 1 actual element was:
  2
whereas expected element was:
  3

Note that 1 and 4 are not displayed in the error message.

**I s

Describe the bug
pa.errors.SchemaErrors.failure_cases only returns the first 10 failure_cases

• I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
• I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandera. 0.6.5
• (optional) I have confirmed this bug exists on the master branch of pandera.

Note: Please read [this guide](https://matthewrocklin.c

As a SDET
I want a documentation or Wiki page where the expected vs actual field matching is explained
So that I can use these in my test automation to test the server response payloads and headers
e.g. id=123 , id="123", isValid=true, isValid="true" etc

AC1:

Cover the following currently supported mechanisms with examples

• $EQ
• (int)
• (float) or (decimal)
• (boolean)

While working on a fix for frankban/quicktest#125 it appeared that there could be an opportunity for improving the Not(Checker) error message for standard checkers, such as Equals, IsTrue etc.

Platform (all, jvm, js): all
Extension (none, kotlin 1.3): none

Code related feature

Following the things you need to do:

• see TODOs in MapToContainInOrderOnlyKeyValueExpectationsSpec

Your first contribution?

• Write a comment I'll work on this if you would like to take this issue over.
  This way we get the chance to revise the description in case things have c

Normally, the "to be truthy" assertion does not take any value as it simply asserts that a subject can be coerced to a boolean true (in the case of "to be falsy" it is coercion to boolean false).

It seems that early on these assertions inherited an optional form where a custom message can be supplied as their argument - this was likely inspired by earlier assertions frameworks (assert on node