Hoping that someone might be willing to take time out of their busy schedule to review this -- it already had reviews from the prior bugs-python discussion. @serhiy-storchaka you gave me a fantastic review with great comments on the wave-pathlib request, do you have time or know someone who has time to review this? For those of us using @property and PyDev, having line-numbers (which get hyperlinked to the appropriate code) would be a great time-saver.

The test is passed if revert changes in Lib/doctest.py. Therefore it doesn't test the changed behavior. Could you provide a test that is passed with the patched code and failed with the unpatched code?

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

Reopening per #61648 (comment)

A

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

The test is passed because it tests lineno attributes of Example instances instead of DocTest instances. Also, the code can be much simpler.

I created an alternative PR #113161.