Skip to content

gh-78486: Unwrap decorators in getfile, rather than downstream #8602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eric-wieser
Copy link
Contributor

@eric-wieser eric-wieser commented Aug 1, 2018

@matrixise
Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser yesterday, there was an other commit with the unwrap function, is it right?

Among other functions, this fixes getsourcefile and getcomments.

Removes some code duplication while I'm here
@eric-wieser
Copy link
Contributor Author

@matrixise: If you're asking if the unwrap function was added recently, I don't think so - inspect.unwrap seems to have been around for a while

@1st1: Fixed

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Contributor Author

@1st1, would you mind re-reviewing?

Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Sep 21, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Dec 15, 2024
@picnixz picnixz changed the title bpo-34305: Unwrap decorators in getfile, rather than downstream gh-78486: Unwrap decorators in getfile, rather than downstream Dec 15, 2024
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time. label Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting review stale Stale PR or inactive for long period of time.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants