bpo-30680: textwrap support for true (Unicode) em-dashes #2224
+41
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
auvipy
approved these changes
May 31, 2019
|
Unfortunately this PR has languished for a long time. Sorry for that! Linking back to the issue explicitly: https://bugs.python.org/issue30680 I'm willing to help see this PR through to completion, if there's still interest in it. I haven't looked closely yet, but:
Also going to close and reopen to retrigger CI. |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
github-actions
bot
removed
the
stale
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
textwrapspecifically recognizes and specially treats the ASCII simulation of an em-dash (two or more consecutive hyphens). It does nothing, however, to recognize and treat true em-dashes (aka'\N{EM DASH}','\u2014', or U+2014). Real em-dashes should get at least as good a treatment as simulated em-dashes.This PR adds parallel treatment, plus tests.
(Some tests for "degenerate" cases of the simulated em-dash, e.g. three or more consecutive hyphens, are not replicated for the true em-dash, because repeating the true em-dash has no common sensible meaning.)
https://bugs.python.org/issue30680