Skip to content

bpo-41354: Adjust filecmp.cmp() to match documentation #21580

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chanke-mpcdf
Copy link

@chanke-mpcdf chanke-mpcdf commented Jul 21, 2020

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

CLA Missing

Our records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA:

@chanke

For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

This change needs a unit test and a news entry.

if shallow and s1 == s2:
return True
if s1[1] != s2[1]:
if s1 != s2:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems like if mtime is different but otherwise files are the same, current code will return True but this PR will change it to return False. That both breaks backwards compatibility and doesn't seem right to me.

@ambv
Copy link
Contributor

ambv commented Aug 4, 2021

Closing in favor of GH-27166.

@ambv ambv closed this Aug 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants