Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gh-94808: Improve coverage of fastsearch.h #96760

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 13, 2022
Merged

gh-94808: Improve coverage of fastsearch.h #96760

merged 1 commit into from Sep 13, 2022

Conversation

sweeneyde
Copy link
Member

@sweeneyde sweeneyde commented Sep 12, 2022 •
edited by bedevere-bot

@sweeneyde sweeneyde added tests Tests in the Lib/test dir skip news labels Sep 12, 2022
@sweeneyde
Copy link
Member Author

sweeneyde commented Sep 12, 2022

This doesn't touch find_char or rfind_char, whose coverage could be improved in a separate PR.

@sweeneyde
Copy link
Member Author

sweeneyde commented Sep 13, 2022

Hitting this with the buildbots to make sure the new tests don't provoke anything.

@sweeneyde sweeneyde added the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Sep 13, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Sep 13, 2022

🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @sweeneyde for commit 84999e6 🤖

If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the "🔨 test-with-buildbots" label again.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the 🔨 test-with-buildbots Test PR w/ buildbots; report in status section label Sep 13, 2022
@mdboom mdboom mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2022
Open
225 tasks
@sweeneyde sweeneyde merged commit 69d9a08 into python:main Sep 13, 2022
84 checks passed
@sweeneyde sweeneyde deleted the cover_fastsearch branch Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@sweeneyde @bedevere-bot