gh-100556: Better or doc working
#100589
gh-100556: Better or doc working
#100589
Conversation
Thanks will do the change |
Doc/library/stdtypes.rst
Outdated
| | | *y* | | | ||
| +-------------+---------------------------------+-------+ | ||
| | ``x and y`` | if *x* is True and *y* is True, | \(2) | | ||
| | | then True, else False | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you misunderstood the other comment, as this now doesn't cover something like
>>> [] and [1]
[]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could you please tell then how should it be framed, bcoz I am not able to think of it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if x and y, then True, else False
it covers if it's Null, empty, False...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thanks i'll do it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original mention of 'true'/'false' refers to all truthy and falsey values, which include 0, None, empty lists, etc., and saying True excludes those as True refers to just the boolean value. I also don't think that it's all that helpful for a table to have an entry to say x and y then its explanation also say x and y, so I would actually recommend just sticking with the original for this and section.
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
gh-100556: changed the or documentation