Let’s avoid five nouns in a row 😄

Maybe its just me, but this was pretty confusing to me and hard to parse and understand. The comma @merwok suggest helps a lot in making the basic grammar more clear, but there still seems to be some problems with the actual semantics here.

As far as I can tell, this should refer to patterns, not replacements, and I was very confused why the latter were mentioned until I realized it was incorrectly copy/pasted from the original mention (that talks about replacement strings).

Also, "bytes strings" is both arguably an oxymoron in Python 3 (since this is presumably intended to specifically refer to bytes, not strings), seemingly ungrammatical (at least without being proper type references), and certainly confusing.

Finally, name should be formatted consistently with id in the previous line, :class:bytes objects are composed of bytes, not characters (though perhaps that's being too pedantic), and it would be useful to explictly specify what the ASCII range is. Implementing all of that, and fixing the phrasing, we have:

Or, with decimal values for the ASCII range,

@CAM-Gerlach Maybe b'\x00'-b'\x7f'?

I guess so; edited. I just didn't want to overcomplicate it.