Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LOAD_SUPER_ATTR doesn't match monitoring behavior of the opcodes it replaces #103865

Closed
carljm opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #103866
Closed

LOAD_SUPER_ATTR doesn't match monitoring behavior of the opcodes it replaces #103865

carljm opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #103866
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Comments

@carljm
Copy link
Contributor

carljm commented Apr 26, 2023

The LOAD_SUPER_ATTR super-instruction optimization doesn't correctly match the PEP 669 monitoring events that would be fired by the call to super() followed by attribute load that it replaces. This should be fixed.

Linked PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant