Allow waitpid(-1) to be woken if a waitpid(pid) call is pending (3.1 backport) #8246
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If two threads are running, with one calling waitpid(-1), and another calling waitpid($some_pid), and then $some_other_pid exits, we would expect the waitpid(-1) call to retrieve that exit status; however, it cannot actually do so until $some_pid also exits.
This patch fixes the issue by unconditionally checking for pending process group waits on SIGCHLD, and then allowing pending pid-only waits to "steal" the notification.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19837
[Fixes #19387]