Skip to content

[3.12] gh-110893: Improve the documentation for __future__ module (GH-114642) #114702

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 29, 2024

nedbat took issue with the phrasing "real module". I'm actually fine
with that phrasing, but I do think the __future__ page should be clear
about the way in which the __future__ module is special. (Yes, there
was a footnote linking to the future statements part of the reference,
but there should be upfront discussion).

I'm sympathetic to nedbat's claim that no one really cares about
__future__._Feature, so I've moved the interesting table up to the
top.
(cherry picked from commit 3b86891)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu 12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--114702.org.readthedocs.build/

…honGH-114642)

nedbat took issue with the phrasing "real module". I'm actually fine
with that phrasing, but I do think the `__future__` page should be clear
about the way in which the `__future__` module is special. (Yes, there
was a footnote linking to the future statements part of the reference,
but there should be upfront discussion).

I'm sympathetic to nedbat's claim that no one really cares about
`__future__._Feature`, so I've moved the interesting table up to the
top.
(cherry picked from commit 3b86891)

Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants