Skip to content

bpo-21423: Add an initializer argument to {Process,Thread}PoolExecutor #4241

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2017
Merged

bpo-21423: Add an initializer argument to {Process,Thread}PoolExecutor #4241

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2017

Conversation

pitrou
Copy link
Member

@pitrou pitrou commented Nov 2, 2017 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

@pitrou
Copy link
Member Author

pitrou commented Nov 2, 2017

@tomMoral, @ogrisel, you might be interested in this.

@pitrou pitrou mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2017
Open
@tomMoral
Copy link
Contributor

tomMoral commented Nov 3, 2017

LGTM.
It is definitely a useful feature. We could probably use it to pass global Event for better sync in the test for concurrent.futures, in order to accelerate them.

@pitrou pitrou merged commit 63ff413 into python:master Nov 4, 2017
@pitrou pitrou deleted the cf_initializer branch November 4, 2017 10:05
embray pushed a commit to embray/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2017
@pitrou @embray
bpo-21423: Add an initializer argument to {Process,Thread}PoolExecutor (
ac4d121 
python#4241)

* bpo-21423: Add an initializer argument to {Process,Thread}PoolExecutor

* Fix docstring
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@pitrou @tomMoral @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot